​

​The Editorial board adopts a double bind review process. Once submitted, a paper dealing with suitable topics will be sent to the editor-in-chief or associate editors of the editorial board, and then be reviewed by at least two experts in the relevant field. Authors are also invited to suggest 3 potential reviewers. The reviewers are either members of our editorial board or special external experts including some of the potential reviewers suggested by the authors invited by the journal. In light of the reviewers' comments, the editor-in-chief assisted by other members of the editorial board will make the final decision over the publication, and return the decision to the author.

​

There are four possible decisions concerning the paper: acceptance, minor revision, major revision, and rejection. Acceptance means the paper will be published without any revision. Minor revision means the author means the author should make minor changes to the manuscript according to reviewers' comments and submit the revised version to the JNMES. The revised version will be accepted or rejected at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief or other members of the editorial board. Major revision means the author should modify the manuscript significantly according to reviewers' comments and submit the revised version to the Editor-in-Chief of the JNMES. The revised version will be accepted or rejected at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief or other members of the editorial board. Rejection means the submitted paper will not be published.